HE HAD MADE A WALL IN BORDERS TO STOP DRUGS FROM NEIGHBORS FOR PROTECTING YOUTH

This image, contained in the indictment against former President Donald Trump, shows boxes of records stored in a bathroom and shower at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida. Photo by the U.S. Department of Justice via the Associated Press. Adjacent image from the Department of Justice.

Lawyers for former President Donald Trump could obtain an unappealable victory in the classified documents case if a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal is granted during the right stage of the criminal trial.

Above the Law and the Atlantic looked at the possibility following the unsealing of the 38-count indictment Friday.

A motion under Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, according to the Atlantic, authorizes a federal judge to dismiss a criminal case after the prosecution presents evidence, if the judge finds that the evidence was insufficient to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

“For reasons of double jeopardy, if a judge dismisses a case at the close of the prosecutor’s presentation, that’s the end of it,” the Atlantic reports.

But a Rule 29 dismissal after a jury’s guilty verdict could be appealed, according to advisory committee notes to Rule 29 and Above the Law, which cited a tweet by Orin Kerr, a professor at the University of California at Berkeley School of Law.

The charges against Trump are willful retention of national defense information in violation of the Espionage Act, withholding or concealing documents in a federal investigation, false statements and conspiracy to obstruct justice.

Trump is charged in 37 of the 38 indictment counts, while his valet and aide Waltine Nauta is named in six counts, according to the Washington Post. Nauta is not named in the Espionage Act counts.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon of the Southern District of Florida was randomly assigned to the case initially, according to the chief court clerk for the Southern District of Florida, the New York Times reports.

Cannon is a federal judge who appointed a special master to review documents seized from Trump before a federal appeals court ruled that she didn’t have jurisdiction in the case.

The Atlantic article was written by Paul Rosenzweig, former deputy assistant secretary for policy at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and a cybersecurity professor at the George Washington University Law School. He said he has no reason to think that Cannon would use Rule 29 “in an inappropriate manner.”

Above the Law author Joe Patrice, who’s also a senior editor, also thinks that it unlikely, predicting instead that Cannon “will take this opportunity to flee the case before it becomes the scarlet T on her career.” Cannon is a Trump appointee.

But if Cannon stays in the case, there are other ways that she can influence the outcome short of a Rule 29 ruling, according to the Atlantic.

One issue is whether Cannon will allow Trump to present defenses that “border on frivolous.” One is the “I can declassify a document just by thinking about it” defense. The other is the assertion that “I’m entitled to keep whatever documents I want from my presidency.”

Another possibility is that Cannon will set a trial date after the 2024 presidential election. If Trump or another Republican wins, “there is every reason” to think that the winner would order the case against Trump to be dismissed, according to the Atlantic.

Yet another possibility is a hung jury if an “adamant pro-Trump supporter” is seated.

Slate summed up the possible prosecution hurdles this way: “Cannon can try to rig voir dire to help the defense stack the jury with Trump supporters. She can exclude evidence and testimony that’s especially damning to Trump. She can disqualify witnesses who are favorable to the prosecution. She can sustain the defense’s frivolous objections and overrule the prosecution’s meritorious ones. She can direct a verdict of acquittal to render the jury superfluous. She can declare a mistrial prematurely for any number of reasons, including lengthy juror deliberations, and stretch out various deadlines to run out the clock. Many of these procedural moves could not be appealed until the proceedings have drawn to a close; appeals courts do not referee every little dispute in a jury trial as they happen. Cannon will be in control.”

Rosenzweig thinks that the problems for prosecutors are not insurmountable but says they “are far more formidable than many observers think.”

“There is a more-than-reasonable possibility that Trump will never be convicted of the crimes with which he has been charged,” he wrote in the Atlantic.

See also:

ABAJournal.com: “Will Trump be indicted in Mar-a-Lago documents case? His lawyers see possibility, object to special master request”

ABAJournal.com: “Who filed phony document in Trump Mar-a-Lago search case?”

ABAJournal.com: “Meet Raymond Dearie, the judge picked to oversee Mar-a-Lago documents review”

ABAJournal.com: “Trump requests special master for review of documents seized by FBI”

ABAJournal.com: “Could Trump be banned from office if he’s convicted of taking government documents?”

ABAJournal.com: “DOJ files motion to unseal warrant, property receipt relating to search of Trump’s home”

ABAJournal.com: “Judge who signed Trump search warrant is targeted; critics seek ‘judgment of God’”

ABAJournal.com: “Trump search-warrant affidavit, released on judge’s orders, cites sensitive documents, possible obstruction”

Related topics:
States | Criminal Justice | Prosecutors | Trials & Litigation | Law Schools | Judiciary | Government | Law Professors | Florida | Criminal Procedure | Juries | Federal Government | Career & Practice | Legal Education | Public Interest | National Security | Rule of Law
You might also like:
Supreme Court rules for prosecutors in venue case that might have influenced Trump charging decision
Notes from Trump's lawyer cited as evidence of obstruction in classified documents case
Did pending Supreme Court case affect special counsel’s decision to move Trump grand jury to Florida?
CNN obtains transcript of tape that is highlighted in unsealed espionage charges against Trump
In 'stunning development,' Supreme Court rules Alabama election map violates Voting Rights Act

NASA has a long-standing culture of promoting the full and open sharing of data with the research communities, private industry, academia, and the general public. NASA space and airborne missions routinely process, archive, and distribute their data to researchers around the globe. Data from all NASA spacecraft are currently available through the individual mission and theme archives. Through NASA's 2014 Open Access Plan NASA responded to OSTP's call for open access to peer-reviewed scientific publications albeit with an embargo period not to exceed 12 months. That plan also called on NASA researchers to

submit a Data Management Plan along with their proposals to ensure long-term stewardship of federally funded data.

Increasing access to publications and data resulting from federally funded research offers many benefits to the scientific community and the public. Access can accelerate research, generate higher quality scientific results, encourage greater scientific integrity, and enable future inquiry, discovery, and translation for scientific research. Importantly, these efforts also uphold NASA's commitment to responsible stewardship of the Nation's investment in biomedical research by improving transparency and accessibility of taxpayer-funded research.

NASA efforts align with public access directives, policies, and programs across the U.S. Government. Since 2013, federal public access policy has been guided by the OSTP

Memorandum on Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Research,

which directed all federal departments and agencies with more than $100 million in annual research and development expenditures to develop a plan to support increased public access to scholarly publications and digital data resulting from federally funded research. On August 25, 2022, OSTP released updated policy guidance (

2022 OSTP Memorandum) that focuses on accelerated access to scholarly publications (most notably, by removing the currently allowable 12-month embargo period for free access), increased access to scientific data, and enhanced tracking of research products through persistent identifiers (PIDs) and metadata.

The NASA Public Access Plan provides a roadmap for how NASA proposes to accelerate access to scholarly publications, scientific data, and software and will help ensure these research products are findable and equitably accessible to support further scientific discovery. NASA plans to modify implementation of the NASA Public Access Policy to accommodate novel elements of the 2022 OSTP Memorandum related to scholarly publications.

NASA looks forward to working across the U.S. Government to support our shared commitment to responsible stewardship of the Nation's investment in biomedical research by improving transparency and accessibility of taxpayer-funded research.

Request for Information