question mark

The film attempts to summarize the issue of the Syrian detainees and the issue of accountability necessary for all those who committed crimes of torture through a simple story that talks about an intelligence officer who cannot sleep with his wife due to psychological problems, so some doctors advise him to go to a psychiatrist
During the dialogue between the doctor and the patient, we will shed light on the broken personality of the intelligence officer who suffers from burning doubts about his wife, while during the dialogue with the doctor, we will discover that the officer was performing a castration of detainees,
The doctor tries to explain to the officer that his castration of detainees is the reason behind his inability to have sex with his wife, through what we call in psychology the punitive effect of a hidden conscience.
However, the officer does not feel any remorse and does not seem convinced that his problem with his wife can be linked to his castration of the detainees and that this is far from the ideology on which he is nourished in that these detainees are criminals, murderers and terrorists
After many attempts by the doctor.. the doctor tells him that he must confess his crimes in order to purify himself from them. And here for the first time a security officer will try to practice the behavior of confession.. what will happen...?